PublicVR Forum
http://publicvr.info/forum/

Modeling Class Final Projects
http://publicvr.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=228
Page 2 of 2

Author:  goshen [ Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:41 am ]
Post subject:  MaxDavenport

<These need their textures fixed.>

Attachments:
DivineStandardsRender.jpg
DivineStandardsRender.jpg [ 12.08 KiB | Viewed 4481 times ]

Author:  goshen [ Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:42 am ]
Post subject:  McMahon

.

Attachments:
TamaleThingRender.jpg
TamaleThingRender.jpg [ 9.02 KiB | Viewed 4593 times ]
BowlOfDatesRender.jpg
BowlOfDatesRender.jpg [ 10.9 KiB | Viewed 4593 times ]

Author:  goshen [ Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:44 am ]
Post subject:  Rutledge

<The other two standards' models are broken.>

Attachments:
HorusStandardRender.jpg
HorusStandardRender.jpg [ 22.27 KiB | Viewed 4487 times ]

Author:  goshen [ Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:45 am ]
Post subject:  Stickland

.

Attachments:
DumplingRender.jpg
DumplingRender.jpg [ 7.4 KiB | Viewed 4593 times ]
RibsRender.jpg
RibsRender.jpg [ 6.19 KiB | Viewed 4593 times ]

Author:  goshen [ Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:46 am ]
Post subject:  VanGorder

.

Attachments:
vessel_version01_render.jpg
vessel_version01_render.jpg [ 15.18 KiB | Viewed 4488 times ]

Author:  goshen [ Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:47 am ]
Post subject:  Wilson

.

Attachments:
LinenWickCandleRender.jpg
LinenWickCandleRender.jpg [ 10.63 KiB | Viewed 4593 times ]
BrownCandleRender.jpg
BrownCandleRender.jpg [ 6.18 KiB | Viewed 4593 times ]

Author:  jdtroche [ Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: GarciaRivera

I would like to mention that fish was a food that we have evidence for in at least some temples was forbidden as an "impure" food for priests to eat. so it is possible it would not have been allowed as an offering either - at least in some temples from which we have this "priestly negative confession" source of evidence. just something to think about!

Author:  goshen [ Mon Mar 01, 2010 10:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: GarciaRivera

Interesting. If fish offerings were permitted in some temples but not in others, we should leave a few in as a talking point.

If we know they were permitted in no temples, and we should remove them.

If their presence is controversial, we should leave them out in educational uses of the temple, but retain the ability to put them back in or "switch them on" easily. Then we can use them as a visual prop in discussions with archaeologists discussing the point.

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/